To,

The Hon’ble Registrar

O/o. the Orissa high Court

Cuttack – 753002, Odisha

 

Subject : Complaint / application u/s 2(a) of the Contempt of High Court of Orissa and Courts Subordinate to it (Regulation of Proceedings) Rules, 1975.  

 

01.Odisha Information Commission, Toshali Bhawan, Satya Nagar, Bhubaneswar

  1. The Registrar, OIC
  2. The Secretary, OIC
  3. Asst. Law Office
  4. Bench Clears
  5. Section Officers
  6. Manoj Parida, State Chief Information Officer
  7. 10.Others

 

Sir,

 

I, The Informant Kamal Agarwal, senior citizen, age about 65 Yrs, S/o. Late Ram Kumar Agarwal, a human rights activist, whistleblower & Others, O/o. The Advocates Chamber, Sector-6, Markat Nagar Cuttack – 753014, Mob : 9348105872 are filling this complaint / Application for the contempt of courts committed by the above named public servants of the Gov.t of Odisha.

 

  1. That,  Nothing has been learnt from the reprimanded to the State Of Odisha by Hon’ble Orissa High Court in the case of Hemanta Nayak Vs State of Odisha, W.P. Civil No. 12399 of 2024 as nothing has been done to issued such as recommendation to the Govt. Instrumentalities to adhere to the rule of law, directions of the competent authority(s) and courts and guidelines of the apex court which proves that State of Odisha and Its public servants have no respect for the rule of law prevails in this country

 

 

  1. That, like a shameless instrumentalities of the Govt. the OIC and its corrupt natured officers are keep closed the complaint, violating the provision of the Odisha State Litigation Policy-201

 

  1. That, The Complaint No. 866 of 2024 was closed  on 27-02-2026 along with the Complaint No. 468 of 2024 whereas there is no such rule to hearing two petition at a time which proves that the section officer closed the same and forged signature of the passing member has been put on the order and communicated to the complainant on 20-03-2026 which was received on 31-03-2026. the Asst. law officer communicated the same without any authority, power and permission thus abetted the crime as the Registrar has to authenticate the order before communicating the same.

 

  1. That, No compensation even awarded to the complainant for causing injury thus violated the direction of the Orissa high court issued in the Hemanta Nayak’s case.

 

  1. That, The OIC acted like the agent of the Opp. parties and its corrupt nature instigated the section officers to tampered the court record for the wrongful gain and the wrongful gain of the ruling political parties and Govt. thus have not respect for the rule of law prevails in this country.

 

  1. That, the order has been passed violating the principle of natural justice and the petitioner has reason to believe that no hearing ever conducted and the section officer passed this order while sitting at his air conditioned office thus committed forgery and cheating and contempt of court also.

 

  1. That, the OIC failed to apply its judicial mind as to whether the information was provided or not and took false grounds that suitable reply were given. There is a huge difference between reply and providing information sought.

 

  1. That, the Order was found without assigning any reason thus the above named public servants have committed contempt of court as to the guidelines of the apex court issued in the case of State Bank of India Vs Ajay Kumar Sood, 

 

  1. That, the order was found a cryptic one and no reason was given for the rejection of the complaint aver stated along with the grounds for the arriving on the reason thus violated the guidelines of the apex court as to the reasoned order passing adjudicating authority(s) in the case ofTHE SIEMENS ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING CO. OF INDIA LTD. —Appellant Vs. THE UNION OF INDIA (UOI) AND ANOTHER — Respondent Civil Appeal No. 1277 of 1968 Decided on : 30-04-1976
  1. The above-mentioned allegations are only the gist of the whole affair and the complainant has a reason to believe that the same has been done on regular basis like an habitual offender under a deep-rooted criminal conspiracy, intentionally, dishonestly, fraudulently and for the wrongful gain and the deceitful means has caused and the accused people are the members of the Organized Crime Syndicate and operating Paisa Vashooli Racket from the Opp. parties to provide favorable orders.

 

So, you are requested to initiate a contempt proceeding against the contemptor and bring back to authority of the court in the mind and soul of the erring public servants and state of Odisha.