Nothing has been learnt from the recommendation of the Hon’ble Orissa High Court in the case of Hemanta Nayak Vs State of Odisha, W.P. Civil No. 12399 of 2024, and the State of Odisha and its instrumentalities are closing the complaint of the citizen on the drop of a hat. 

01. That, the who OHRC is a victim of the RED TAPISM and OFFICERDOM, as becomes by the Odisha Information Commission, where the section offiecer are passing orders impersonating as members of the OHRC, Mr. CR. Mohapatra, and forging the signature of the passing members and the Registrar. 

02. That, the OHRC cannot demand a Vakalatnama from a complainant who is a legal practitioner as well as a Human Rights Activist, as the OHRC is not a court of law. and the complaint no. 4927 of 2025 was filed in individual capacity and as the representative of the victims.

03. That the order passed on Dt. 09-01-2026 and sent on 24-02-2026 and reached on 07-03-2026 to the complainant, which proves that the OHRC has no manpower and infrastructure to operate like a human rights commission, thus running for mere formality.

04. That, the OHRC has an obligatory duty to redress the human rights complaint as per the provisions of the Odisha State Litigation Policy-2011, but the OHRC and its members have violated the same 

05. That, the petitioners being the legal practitioners of the Hon’ble Orissa high Court have reason to believe that 1000 of other human rights complaints are closed like this illegally and arbitrarily, as the OHRC has been hijacked by the agent of the Government who have specifically implanted in the office of the OHRC to sabotaged the complaints against the police and the Govt. instrumentalities.

06. That, a human right complaint cannot be rejected taking the false ground that the complainant are beither the victims(s) nor the aggrieved person. So you are requested to invoke the provision of the Odisha government Servant Conduct Rule -1959 against the erring public servants.