defaultBail2

What is Default Bail?

• This is a right to bail that accrues when the police fail to complete the investigation within a specified period regarding a person in judicial custody.
  • It is also known as Statutory Bail. 
• This is enshrined in Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)
• Sec 167 (1) requires the police to produce the suspect to the nearest Judicial Magistrate and seek orders for either police or judicial custody if they are unable to complete an investigation in 24 hours.
• Under Section 167(2) of the Code, a Magistrate can order an accused person to be detained in the custody of the police for 15 days. Beyond the police custody period of 15 days, the Magistrate can authorize the detention of the accused person in judicial custody where the accused cannot be detained for more than:
  • 90 days, when an authority is investigating an offense punishable with death, life imprisonment or  for at least ten years; or
  • 60 days, when the authority is investigating any other offense.
  • In some other special laws like Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, this period may vary.
    • In Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the period is 180 days.
• In case the investigation is not completed by the end of this period, the court shall release the person “if he is prepared to and does furnish bail”. This is known as default bail.

What are the Arguments in favour?

• Presumption of Innocence: Default bail upholds the fundamental principle of “innocent until proven guilty.” It ensures that individuals who are accused of a crime but have not been convicted are not subjected to indefinite pre-trial detention.
• Protecting Civil Liberties: Default bail protects the civil liberties and rights of individuals. It ensures that people are not deprived of their liberty without sufficient evidence and a formal trial, promoting the principles of fairness and justice.
• Promoting Rehabilitation and Integration: Default bail helps accused individuals stay in their communities for rehabilitation and integration, while still working and supporting their families, increasing their chances of successful reintegration if found not guilty.
• Preventing Abuse of Power: Default bail acts as a safeguard against potential abuse of power by the investigating agencies. It prevents authorities from unjustly keeping individuals in custody without presenting evidence and framing charges within a reasonable period.
• Balancing Detention and Liberty: Default bail strikes a balance between the need to prevent potential flight risks and the preservation of an individual’s right to liberty. It allows the court to assess the necessity of continued detention based on the prosecution’s ability to present evidence within the prescribed time frame.
• Reducing Overcrowding in Prisons: Default bail helps in mitigating prison overcrowding by ensuring that individuals who are not promptly charged or have weak cases are not unnecessarily detained. This contributes to more efficient utilization of prison resources.

What are the Arguments Against Default Bail?

• Risk of Granting Bail to Potentially Dangerous Individuals: Default bail is granted when the prosecution fails to file charges within the stipulated time period. Granting automatic bail in such cases may pose a risk if the accused is potentially dangerous or a threat to society. It could compromise public safety and hinder effective law enforcement.
• Undermining the Investigation Process: Automatic bail provisions can potentially undermine the investigation process. If the accused is released on default bail without charges being filed, it may impede further gathering of evidence or hamper the prosecution’s ability to build a strong case. This could lead to a lack of justice and hinder the fair resolution of cases.
• Accountability and Public Perception: It may give the impression that accused individuals are getting away without facing due process or being held accountable for their alleged crimes.
• Undermine the rights of the Victims: Granting automatic bail may impede the rights of victims to see timely justice and could lead to a sense of injustice or inequality in the treatment of different parties involved in the case.

What should be the Way Forward?

• Review and Refine Time Limits: Review and revise existing time limits for filing charges based on case complexity to ensure thorough investigation and avoid unnecessary delays.
• Involve Judicial Discretion: Granting judiciary the discretion to deny default bail in cases that pose a risk to public safety or hinder investigation process may allow judges to make informed decisions based on individual circumstances.
• Enhanced Scrutiny and Conditions: Implement stricter scrutiny and impose appropriate conditions for granting default bail, such as stringent reporting requirements.
• Expedite Legal Proceedings: Expedite legal process by investing in infrastructure, enhancing investigative capabilities, increasing judges and court staff, and implementing case management techniques.
• Follow Victim-Centered Approach: Recognize victims’ rights and interests by providing timely information about case progress and involving them in bail decision-making process, where appropriate, to ensure a balanced approach.

In Other Cases ; 

• CBI vs Anupam J. Kulkarni (1992):    The SC Held that a magistrate can authorize police custody for a maximum of 15 days after the arrest of the accused. After this period, any further detention must be in judicial custody, except in cases where the same accused is implicated in a different case arising from a separate incident or transaction. In such situations, the magistrate may consider authorizing police custody again.
• Uday Mohanlal Acharya vs. State of Maharashtra (2001): The SC while relying upon the judgment of Sanjay Dutt vs State, held that the accused shall be said to avail of his right to default bail when he files an application for the same and not when he is released on default bail. If an order of default bail is passed in favour of the accused, but he/she fails to furnish bail and a charge sheet is filed in the meantime, then the right to default bail shall stand extinguished.
• Achpal vs State of Rajasthan (2018): The Supreme Court held that an investigation report, albeit complete, if filed by an unauthorized investigating officer, would not bar the accused from availing default bail.
• Jasbir Singh vs National Investigating Agency (2023): The Supreme Court in this case held that an accused is not entitled to seek default bail on the grounds that the chargesheet, though filed within the requisite period, remains “incomplete” for lack of sanction under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
• M. Ravindran vs. The Intelligence Officer, CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 699 OF 2020 :  Supreme Court Mandates that the courts should Inform Accused About Their Right To ‘Default Bail’ Once It Accrues. The bench also observed that if the Court deliberately does not decide the bail application but adjourns the case by granting time to the prosecution, it would be in violation of the legislative mandate.