The Interim Application No. DC/350/IA/9/2026 was rejected by the accused No.1 and 2 violating the provision of section 36 of the consumer protection act-2019 taking false ground whereas other DCDRC are admitting and entertaining this type of application and providing remedies to the consumer by the DCDRC, Cuttack has rejected 100s of other consumers complaints illegally and arbitrarily and the complainant has reason to believe that the same has been done under a deep-rooted criminal conspiracy, intentionally dishonestly, fraudulently and for the wrongful gain and the deceitful means has caused injuries to the masses. 

01. That, The accused people have violated the provision of section 36 of the Consumer Protection Act-2019 which mandates for the compliance of the Principle of natural justice as to no one can remain unheard but nothing has been done by the accused people to comply with the same and the Interim Application was rejected on the drop of a hat and taking false grounds which proves that the accused people have not respect for the rule of law, directions of the competent authority(s) and courts and the guidelines of the apex court.

02. That the District Magistrate being the competent authority u/s 16 & 17 of the Consumer protection Act-2019 did nothing to go after the main accused people even of the multiple complaints have been filed against the same. 

03. That, the SCDRC & NCDRC being the competent authority having obligatory duty to monitor the affairs of the subordinate commission as per the provision of section 70 of CPA-2019 but nothing has been done towards the same even if multiple complaints have been filed before them.

So please take urgent cognizance into the matter compensate the aggrieved people adequately, deposit Rs.200 crore in the consumer welfare fund SAP, make further arrangement for the department proceeding against the erring public services as per the Odisha Government Servants conduct Rules -1959 and oblige.