It is a fundamental right of every citizen that his case to be adjudicated by an impartial, competent and honest judge but the DCDRC, Cuttack is in the hands of incompetent, impotent and powerless people who are running the same for mere formalities and acting as the agent of the ruling political parties and Government and rejecting the consumer complaints on the drop of a hat.

  1. That, the consumer complaint  and the Interim Application were rejected violating the provision of section 36 and 100 of the consumer protection act-2019 and the applicant being the legal practitioner(s) have reason to believe that 1000 of other consumer complaints are rejected like this illegally and arbitrarily. The DCDRC, Cuttack while passing the order Dt. 20-02-2026 did not disputed the fact that the relationship, between the litigating parties is of consumer and service provider but took extra judicial grounds to reject the same which proves that the DCDRC, Cuttack and its members are working under a deep-rooted criminal conspiracy , intentionally dishonestly, fraudulently and for the wrongful gain of the Opp. parties who are the State Government  and its instrumentalities

 

  1. That, The provision of the section 36 of the consumer protection act-2019 mandates for the compliance of the provision of the principle of natural justice as to “ NO ONE CAN BE REMAIN UNHEARD” but thing has been done to comply with the same thus the thus DCDRC and its passing members have committed the crime u/s 198,199,201, 204 of the BNS-2023 apart from the professional misconducts and they are the habitual offences as they have rejected other 1000 of consumer complaints like this.

 

  1. That, the provision of the section 100 of the consumer protection act-2019 mandates for the redressal of the consumer complaint even if other remedies are available to the complainant as the “ ACT NOT IN DEROGATION OF ANY OTHER LAW”  thus no order shall be passed directing the complainant to approach any other forums for the redressal of the complaint but since the DCDRC, Cuttack has been hijacked by the agent of the Government thus this type of illegal and arbitral order has been passed since last five years even of the DCDRC, BARMER, Rajasthan and DCDRC, Kalahandi are admitting the same type of complaint and providing relief.
  2. That, the orders Dt. 20-02-2026 rejecting the main complaint and the Interim Application have not been signed by the passing members which is nothing but the act of forgery of the court and government record and the contempt of the supreme court guidelines issued in the case of  STATE BANK OF INDIAN VS AJAY KUMAR SOOD, SLP No. 4038 of 2021 which mandates for the singing of the order by the passing authority and uploading of the same in the official website and none compliance of the same proves that the DCDRC and its members have no respect for the rule of law.
  1. That, nothing has been done by the DCDRC, Cuttack to provide the Video Conference Mode of hearing to the legal practitioner ( as the complainant was a legal actioner ) as per the guidelines of the apex court issued in the case of KISHAN CHANDR AJAIN VS UOI, w.p. Civil No. 360of 2021 thus the dcdrc committed the contempt of court
  1. That, nothing has been done to appoint registrant for the DCDRC and the communication of the orders to the litigants which proves that the State Government has no respect for the rule of law and considering themselves above the law. THUS THIS REVIEW PETITION.