The Interim Application No. DC/350/IA/9/2026 was rejected by the accused No.1 and 2 violating the provision of section 36 of the consumer protection act-2019 taking false ground whereas other DCDRC are admitting and entertaining this type of application and providing remedies to the consumer by the DCDRC, Cuttack has rejected 100s of other consumers complaints illegally and arbitrarily and the complainant has reason to believe that the same has been done under a deep-rooted criminal conspiracy, intentionally dishonestly, fraudulently and for the wrongful gain and the deceitful means has caused injuries to the masses.
01. That, The accused people have violated the provision of section 36 of the Consumer Protection Act-2019 which mandates for the compliance of the Principle of natural justice as to no one can remain unheard but nothing has been done by the accused people to comply with the same and the Interim Application was rejected on the drop of a hat and taking false grounds which proves that the accused people have not respect for the rule of law, directions of the competent authority(s) and courts and the guidelines of the apex court.
02. That the complainant(s), being the legal practitioners of the Orissa High Court, have reason to believe that the section officers are passing this type of rejection order under the very instigation of the presiding and other members of the commission, who are operating like an organized crime syndicate, government and court registers and records are tampered with for the wrongful gain. The crime has been committed since long time, as the deceitful means have caused injuries to the litigants as well as to the legal practitioners and their law chambers.
03. The above allegations are only the GIST of the whole affair.