Sarah Sunny Vs Lalit Kumar & Ors.

All Lawyers survive but all soldiers die

On Dt. 29-06-2024  one order was passed by the presiding judge Dr. Justice S.K.Panigrahi in the case of Lalit Kumar Vs UOI & Ors., WP(c) No.11392 of 2014.

It took almost 10 years to decide a matter by a constitutional court.

It is about the right to promotion which is considered a fundamental right.

The Petitioner being the member of the security force passed the written Examination for promotion in rank.

The Petitioner passed the physical test.

But the petitioner failed in medical test as he is having single testis in his scrotum.

This petitioner as well as the prayer were rejected by taking a single ground that the petitioner is medically unfit even if the petitioner is serving as a constable in the CISF.

The reference of the Km Priyanka Vs UOI, Ors. was taken to reject the petitioner’s plea where as this case is related to physical examination whereas the petitioner passed the physical examination.

ANOTHER UPSC ASPIRANTS KARTIK KANSAL’s TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE: 90% MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY DISABILITY, 271 RANK IN 2021 BUT NO SERVICE ALLOTTED TO HIM.

A UPSC candidate with muscular dystrophy has been denied any service despite having cleared the examination four times, 

IIT Roorkee graduate Kartik Kansal, who has been using a wheelchair since he was 14 years old, was selected for the civil services four times in 2019 (rank 813), 2021 (271), 2022 (784) and 2023 (829). Kansal is currently a scientist in ISRO, a post for which he was selected through all-India central recruitment.

In 2021, he ranked 271 even without a disability quota and should have got IAS as ranks 272 and 273 got IAS in that year. However, in 2021, muscular dystrophy was not included in the list of conditions in functional classification eligible for IAS.

OUR QUESTIONS ARE ; 

Is there a separate rule for separate people in this country?

Is all soldiers born to die?

Is all lawyer got judicial immunity?

If a deaf and mute advocate Sarah Sunny can practice in the Supreme Court then why not a constable having single testis cannot be promoted?

What are the challenges the constable will face after getting promoted to SI rank? which is not faced by the advocate Sarah Sunny?

Why the Supreme Court and high courts are supporting every wrongdoing of the advocate community but the members of the armed forces are not getting justice?

When  the Constitutional court realizes the plight of the citizen as to justice delay is justice denied.?

When constitutional court realizes its duty?

This judge required a detailed discussed judgment of the Supreme Court but his own judgments is cryptic

Is the principle of vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt applicable only on petitioner and not on judge / court?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *