Phantom Blogs

Legal Blogs

Principles of Natural Justice

No one can be judge of his own cause,
Right to be heard
No one can pass unreasoned judgement
No one can pass cryptic order.

No one is perfect

Even Judges Do mistakes,
Silly Mistake
Knowingly,
Unknowingly.

A Dismay Story of Indian Advocates

Advocates are made not born,

An argument at Silly-Point


between a judge and a lawyer
a hon'ble Orissa high Court
on the point of making the Registrar of NHRC a party to the suit

A video
presentation

During Law Study
At Chhattisgarh, Raipur
Farhan Coaching
In English

Discrimination between
a poor and a rich CCL

Odisha Vs Maharastra
Rich Father & Sugar Daddy Vs Single Mother
Nayagarh Pari Murder Vs Pune Poscha Car Case

No More Safety In The Place of Safety

ALL are sleeping and the future of the country is behind the bar.

SAVE THE CHIDREN IN CONFLICT WITH LAW

State Considered them the second-class citizen of this country

College Teacher
Vs
College Student

The IPS Arun Bothra implicated two innocent in the false cases.

Coming Soon......

AIBE
Vs
CPET

Two Examinations of a kind,
One for wrongful gain
another for
public interest.

AIBE - A mockery of the Indian legal education system whereas the CPET is a real one.

Sarah Sunny Vs Lalit Kumar & Ors.

Nepotism Still Prevails in the Court
All Lawyers survive
All Soldiers die



Judiciary's
Blue Eyed Boys

Bar Council of India
State Bar Councils
Laywers
are the blue eyed boys of the Indian Judiciary
and they will never gets punished by the Indian Judiciary even if the large scale misconducts, absue of power and corruption prevailing in these offices.


A Noble Cause
by Our Senior Advocate
Advocate T.K.Dwibedi

Planting a Tree a small step by a man but a giant leap by the Mankind as we have only one HOME to live in the Mother EARTH.


Example set by the young lawyer Advocate Abinash Giri of Bhadrak

by marriage a girl before Marriage officer of Bhadrak in a single ceremony and without taking a single paisa a Dowry.


Orissa High Court Acting like
an Agent of
Rulling Government and
Political Party

In MLA Pradeep Panigrahi Case.
Lady IIC of PATANA Police Station Case
and Numerious more.
The Poeple of Odisha lost all hope and faith in it and engaging antisocial to redress their grievances.

The provision of Article 50 of the Constitution of India Violated for the wrongful gain

Most Mis-used judgement of the Supreme Court by the PIOs

CBSE Vs Aditya Bandopadhyay, Civil Appeal No.6464 of 2011.

False Implication of Dr. Dilbag Singh Thakur of SCB Medical Colleve and Hospital in the crime No.201 of 2024 by the Mangalabag Police Statation

Thus violated the Supreme Court guidelines
Lalita Kumari Vs State of UO, WP Crl. 68 of 2008
Commisisonerate Police Vs Devender Anand & Anr , Crl. Appeal No.834 of 2017
Direction of the CID-CB vide Notification No. 31787 Dt. 31-08-2019.

Odisha High Court Mediation Centre is running for mere formality.

As it is in the hands of incompetent, impotent and powerless people.

Cheating and Forgery Committed by DCP Prateek Singh of Bhubaneswar-UPD

the DCP has sublet his police duty to the section officer who is signing as the DCP of Bhubaneswar-UPD

Misconducts, Abuse of power, abuse of process of law and corruption prevailing in the Tenkasi District Judiciary of Tamil Nadu

No monitoring by the High Court as per the provision of section 529 of BNSS-2023 and it is done under a deep-rooted criminal conspiracy, intentionally, dishonestly, fraudulently and for the wrongful gain.

Supreme Court guidelines of the protection of Medical Professionals-2024

This is a Suo motu cognizance taken by the apex court due to the unfortunate incident of alleged Rape and Murder of the lady doctor in the RG Kar hospital of Kolkata.

Legal Misadventure by lawyer is strictly prohibited

but here in the State of Odisha legal misadventure is the source of the collection of illegal money as more than 20000 petitions are filed before the hon'ble Orissa High Court for the registration of FIR even if the same has been prohibited as per the rule of law, direction of the competent authority(s) and as per the guidelines of the apex court given in the cases of Priyanka Srivastava & Sakir Bahu.

pradeepPanigrahi

Hon’ble Orissa high Court acted like an agent of the rulling govennment and political party in the Ex MLA Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi case causing further sabataging the faith of people of Odisha in It which is already lost. The Supreme Court on Thursday set aside a judgment of the Orissa High Court which had quashed an Odisha Lokayukta order for a probe by the state vigilance department against Gopalpur MLA Pradeep Panigrahi. Acting on a complaint the Odisha Lokayukta had directed a preliminary inquiry on December 11, 2020, DSP vigilance Ranjan Kumar Das filed a complaint under a secret inquiry by the anti-corruption wing. While issuing the order, the Odisha Lokayukta had observed that prima facie probe revealed that Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi amassed assets disproportionate to his known source of income by resorting to corrupt practices. Panigrahi had then filed the high court, petition challenging the legality of the Odisha Lokayukta’s order. Acting on it, the High Court quashed Odisha Lokayukta’s  order on February 3, 2021 on grounds that it went beyond the concept of fair trial as the complainant (state vigilance) and investigating authority are the same. Subsequently, Lokayukta challenged it in the Supreme Court. Allowing the petition, the two-judge bench of Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Bela M Trivedi on Thursday ruled that there was “no legal infirmity” in the Odisha Lokayukta’s December 11, 2020 order as it was “within the scope and ambit” of it powers. The SC Bench said high court’s February 3, 2021 order is “not legally sustainable” as it completely overlooked the Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014. If the Orissa high court and its presiding judges do not have any idea about whether the Principle of Natural Justice is violated in a particular case or not then how the people of the state expect them that they can ascertain whether a murder, Rape or dacoity is committed or not. The young lawyers who are working on this blog have reason to believe that the Orissa High Court does not consider itself as part of the Union of India and does not consider that the precedents of the Supreme Court are also binding on them. the young lawyers feel that they are in the wrong profession and do not have any future in the same because they will not be able to grant any remedy to their client if the top judiciary of the state operates a Paisa Vashooli Racket. The State Government and the High Court are acting on a Quad Pro Quo basis being partners in crime as nobody taking any action against each other to eradicate the corruption prevailing in the Government and higher judiciary of the state. More than 20000 orders have been passed since the judgments of the apex court in Priyanka Srivastava Vs State of UP, 2015, Sakiri Basu etc. but the Orissa HC and its officers are not complying with the same for the wrongful gain. No contempt of court proceeding was ever initiated against the erring IIC of the Police Station and SP of the district making the lives of the domiciles miserable. No direction even issued to register FIR against the erring IIC and SPs u/s 166A of the IPC,1860 for violation the rule of law and the direction of law. It is a universal fact that there is no law education in the state for last 30 years as the BCI and OSBC failed miserably to promote and regulate law education in the state as these are regularly extortion money and bribes from the letter pad law colleges of the state who have been granted temporary approval without any inspection by the BCI and OSBC and the principal of the law colleges are selling the answer material for money to the law students so that they can write in the examination and by such unfair means the law graduates are securing their law degrees without imparting any law education from the college and procuring enrollment in the BAR by paying Rs.42,000/- as extortion/bribe to become an advocate. The Hon’ble Orissa High Court also accepted this fact but nothing has been done to curve the same as the same is running under a deep-rooted criminal conspiracy.

View Post »

advAbinashGiri

Advocate Abinash Giri married before the marriage office in a simple ceremony On Dt. 25-07-2024 Advocate Abinash Giri practicing at the Advocates Chamber at Cuttack, Odisha gets married to a girl before the marriage officer of the Bhadrak District in a simple ceremony which cost him less than Rs.3000/- only which includes the registration fee, cost of garlands and sweets and a lunch for the attendee thus setting an example for other who spent lakh and crore unnecessarily in a marriage. He has not taken a single paisa a dowry setting the example for others who are demanding dowry by opening their mouth wide open and harassing the bride and her family compelling them to sell their land and gold for the dowry. The best of the marriage was he choose his advocate uniform as his groom’s dress for the ceremony.  

View Post »

JudiciarysBlueEyedBoys

Judiciary’s Blue Eyed Boys Introduction The perception of the legal profession in our country has been evolving, yet shocking tales of malpractice and exploitation continue to surface. The situation raises serious questions about the integrity of judicial system and the responsibilities of its gatekeepers. Amidst rising fees and questionable enrollment practices, we find ourselves asking: how did we get to this point High Courts and the Supreme Court’s InactionOne of the most perplexing aspects of our judiciary is the apparent inaction of the High Courts and the Supreme Court. Despite numerous complaints regarding the conduct of Bar Councils and lawyers, no significant steps have been taken to address these issues. The Cost of Enrollment Enrollment fees have skyrocketed from Rs. 750/- to a staggering Rs. 42,000/-. This sudden increase raises concerns about accessibility and fairness in the legal profession. Everyone should have an equal opportunity to enter the field, but such high fees invariably exclude those from less privileged backgrounds. Lack of Oversight Enrollment committees, which are essential to maintaining standards in legal education and practice, are often non-existent or inactive. With no standard operating procedures in place, there’s a glaring lack of checks and balances. Anyone, regardless of their background—whether they’re auto drivers or local officials—can enroll, as long as they can pay the fee. State Bar Councils do not have any right to issued permanent enrollment to the law graduates who have not cleared the AIBE but State Bar Council like Odisha and others are not complying to the direction of the BCI. The Consequences of Neglect The failure of the Bar Council to enforce educational standards and promote quality legal education can have far-reaching consequences. When almost anyone can practice law without proper training, the very foundation of justice is questioned. The Erosion of Legal Standards The influx of inadequately trained lawyers into the system can lead to unprofessional behavior and poor service. Clients may find themselves represented by individuals who lack the necessary skills and knowledge, eroding trust in the legal profession. Sabotage of Legal Education Rather than fostering an environment that promotes rigorous legal education, the Bar Council appears to have diverted attention from critical educational frameworks. This not only affects aspiring lawyers but also compromises the quality of legal representation available to the public. Nothing has been done by the BCI or State Bar Councils to promote or regulate law education in the country as the approvals are given to the letter-pad law colleges without any inspection which are law degree shops. BCI never redressed any complaint filed against these colleges rather informed these colleges privately about the complaint filed by the law students who have punished by the law colleges BCI is nothing but the partner in crime of the education mafias of this country which are more dangerous than the terrorists. The Role of the Bar Council The Bar Council’s role is to ensure that the legal profession maintains a standard of excellence. However, its current practices leave much to be desired. A Call for Accountability The Bar Council must be held accountable for the way it manages enrollment and education. Implementing clear standards for enrollment along with proper oversight can restore the dignity of the legal profession in our country. Emphasizing Quality Education Promoting legal education should be a priority for the Bar Council. Workshops, seminars, and outreach programs could significantly elevate the overall standards and inspire a new generation of competent lawyers. Conclusion We find ourselves at a crossroads where urgent action is needed to rectify the issues plaguing our legal system. The time has come for the High Courts, the Supreme Court, and the Bar Council to step up, enforce regulations, and prioritize quality legal education and ethical practices. The way forward isn’t complex—it just requires a commitment to accountability and fairness. Our justice system deserves it, and so do the people who rely on it for representation and protection.

View Post »

placeofsafety

To Odisha State Commission for the Protection of Child RightsBhubaneswar, Odisha  Subject: Urgent Attention Required for Inadequate Facilities at the Place of Safety in Rourkela  Place of Safety. Sir, I, Advocate A.K. Sharma  a concerned citizen, hereby submit this complaint petition to bring to your attention the deplorable conditions prevailing at the Place of Safety in Rourkela. The situation is alarming and requires immediate intervention to safeguard the rights and well-being of the inmates as the under-mentioned facilities are not available in the place of safety.  Lack of Basic Facilities: There is no Sick Room available for inmates who require medical attention. The absence of a library deprives the inmates of educational and recreational resources. The superintendent has no quarters, affecting their ability to manage the facility effectively. The absence of a counseling hall hinders rehabilitation efforts. No e-Mulakat facility ever provided for the lawyers and family members Many Children are implicated in false cases Many Children are denied bail violating the provision of the JJ act 2015. Inadequate Sanitation Facilities: There is no bathroom for staff members, including female staff. The lack of proper sanitation facilities compromises hygiene and health.   Impact on Inmates: Three inmates have already become fugitives due to the substandard conditions. Children from respectable families are interacting with antisocial peers, jeopardizing their safety and well-being. The inadequate environment has disrupted their education, hindering their prospects. Many children have relinquished their studies due to the lack of facilities for study in the Place of Safety. Request for Immediate Action: Facility Upgradation: Urgently allocate resources to establish a Sick Room, a library, and proper quarters for the superintendent. Create a dedicated counseling hall for rehabilitation and support services.   Sanitation Facilities: Construct bathrooms for staff members to maintain hygiene and dignity.   Inquiry and Accountability: Investigate the circumstances that led to the escape of three inmates. Hold accountable those responsible for the inadequate conditions.   Additional Information:  There is a direction of the Bombay High Court to provide library and sufficient books in the library Please treat this matter with utmost urgency, considering the rights and safety of the inmates. I trust that the Odisha Human Rights Commission will take the necessary steps to rectify the situation and ensure a humane environment at the Place of Safety. Instead of taking action against the violation of Child Rights the OSCPCR is calling them a guest in their function as the tainted IPS Arun Bothra was invited as a guest even if he violated the child rights vy falsely implicating the CCL in the Nayagarh Pari Case. Declaration: I confirm that the information provided in this complaint petition is true to my knowledge and belief. Date:  29-06-2024 Place:  Cuttack after filling of the complaint before the OSCPCR notice has been issued on Dt. 05-07-2004, to the Chairperson of the Child Welfare Committee of Sundargarh District to conduct an inquiry into matter. View Order of OSCPRC Dt. 05-07-2024

View Post »

legalrights

Table of Contents Subscribe Legal Rights Legal Rights for Women in India. Doors of court never closed for any women in this country. So get your remedy availed. Matrimonial Rights The relationship between a husband and wife is considered the biggest relationship which is based of faith and confidence and is unconditional where two strangers join together to walk the rest of their lives together. thus in this relationship, there is always the highest number of problems arising. HER-Initiative The Commissionerate police launched an initiative under the banner of High Efficiency Response (HER) for the safety of women here. Police have released a dedicated helpline number, 6372500400, to receive complaints from people.

View Post »

PoorVsRich-1

Poor Vs Rich Child in Conflict with Law ( CCL ) This is a case of missing minor girl of age 5 where there was no eye witness to the case and district police failed miserably to detect the crime but after five year only to address the public demand an innocent CCL now a major was implicated falsely in  this case where the victim family is not considering the CCL a guilty in this case. This Pune Accident case is the best example of sugar grand father and rich dady who are giving speed car and money to their minor child to commit crime. there were eye witnesess to the case but all united to get the CCL a bail and take my word he will be a free one in this case. In both the case police acted as per the Instigation of the Government and complied with the wise of the general public so that the CCLs cannot be set free on bail. IPS Arun Bothra is well trained to implicate innocent in case cases. he has falsely implicated an innocent college teacher in the Patnagarh Double bomb blast case and one college student in the Nayagarh Pari missing case. In both cases accused are chosen to have no male member of the family so that his case can be found in the case and the IPS openly threatened about the same. In both the cases money are given, taken and offered. In both the cases custodial torture of third degree used to get the confessions of the accused so that the evidence case be prepared. In both the case IPS Arun Bothra threatened to implicate the ladies members of the accused family in the case if the accused will not implicate him voluntarily. Both Rina Rani the wife of the deceased in the Patnagarh Bomb Blast case and the mother of Pari in the Nayagarh case are not considering the implicated accused people as the guilty in the case. they both openly declaring that the police have implicated innocents in the case only to silent the Government, public and politicians. In both cases the Juvenile Justice Boards were failed miserably to comply with the law and acted as per the instigation of the police, prosecutors etc. and now facing departmental inquiry but there is hardly any action on the JJB of Nayagarh, CWC, Child Protection officer etc. of Nayagarh, Odisha Bombay High Court came in the rescue of the CCL of Pune, Maharstra but there is no help from the Orissa High court to the CCL of Pari case. The Righ CCL gets bail in a single day and the same was held by the Bombay High Court. but the Pool CCL is inside the jail since last 4 years and the Odisha High Court is sleeping like KHUMBHAKARNA. Bombay high court is one from where the present CJI Mr. Chandrachure and other prominent justices have woked but Odisha High Court is one where the products of letter pad colleges are becoming the judges of it. Mahastratra is the rich state where Advocate like Sriramjeth Malani started his career but the Odisha is one where there is no law education since last 30 yeards. Maharastra is a state where judges are removed for passing the perverse order Whereas the Odisha is the State where operators of the Paisa Vashooli Racket is presiding in the constitutional court.

View Post »
LegalBlogs
Advocates Chamber

Sarah Sunny Vs Lalit Kumar

Sarah Sunny Vs Lalit Kumar & Ors. All Lawyers survive but all soldiers die View the Judgment On Dt. 29-06-2024  one order was passed by the presiding judge Dr. Justice S.K.Panigrahi in the case of Lalit Kumar Vs UOI & Ors., WP(c) No.11392 of 2014. It took almost 10 years to decide a matter by a constitutional court. It is about the right to promotion which is considered a fundamental right. The Petitioner being the member of the security force passed the written Examination for promotion in rank. The Petitioner passed the physical test. But the petitioner failed in medical test as he is having single testis in his scrotum. This petitioner as well as the prayer were rejected by taking a single ground that the petitioner is medically unfit even if the petitioner is serving as a constable in the CISF. The reference of the Km Priyanka Vs UOI, Ors. was taken to reject the petitioner’s plea where as this case is related to physical examination whereas the petitioner passed the physical examination. ANOTHER UPSC ASPIRANTS KARTIK KANSAL’s TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE: 90% MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY DISABILITY, 271 RANK IN 2021 BUT NO SERVICE ALLOTTED TO HIM. A UPSC candidate with muscular dystrophy has been denied any service despite having cleared the examination four times,  IIT Roorkee graduate Kartik Kansal, who has been using a wheelchair since he was 14 years old, was selected for the civil services four times in 2019 (rank 813), 2021 (271), 2022 (784) and 2023 (829). Kansal is currently a scientist in ISRO, a post for which he was selected through all-India central recruitment. In 2021, he ranked 271 even without a disability quota and should have got IAS as ranks 272 and 273 got IAS in that year. However, in 2021, muscular dystrophy was not included in the list of conditions in functional classification eligible for IAS. OUR QUESTIONS ARE ;  Is there a separate rule for separate people in this country? Is all soldiers born to die? Is all lawyer got judicial immunity? If a deaf and mute advocate Sarah Sunny can practice in the Supreme Court then why not a constable having single testis cannot be promoted? What are the challenges the constable will face after getting promoted to SI rank? which is not faced by the advocate Sarah Sunny? Why the Supreme Court and high courts are supporting every wrongdoing of the advocate community but the members of the armed forces are not getting justice? When  the Constitutional court realizes the plight of the citizen as to justice delay is justice denied.? When constitutional court realizes its duty? This judge required a detailed discussed judgment of the Supreme Court but his own judgments is cryptic Is the principle of vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt applicable only on petitioner and not on judge / court?

View Post »

presentation-1

https://youtu.be/MWJ3cFZRczg?si=WTN7yDZPC2hCDnmS On Dt. 09-05-2019 a presentation on English at the Farhan Coaching centre at the capital city of Raipur, Chhattisgarh. During the Law Study days. One of the most memorable moment of my life. कोई लौटा दे मेरे बिते हुए दिन ।  

View Post »

sillypoint-1

https://www.youtube.com/live/wTOW_G5LhwE?si=wxHNjgIFmBbgXlDx On Dt. 21-06-2024 during an argument, the presiding judge Shri S.K.Panigrahi raised the question against the petitioner’s decision to make the Registrar of NHRC a party. The petitioner’s lawyer replied, “Otherwise how can they use the provision of Article 226 of the Constitution of India if a public office is not involved” The Judge asked for the case law of the apex court allowing the Registrar of a forum a party to the suit. The lawyer has not instant reply. The judge refused to issue notice to the Registrar of the NHRC. The point is that whether the Registrar of the NHRC will hire a lawyer to appear before the court by paying fee from his own pocket or the lawyer appointed by the NHRC will appear? What if the NHRC only would be a party. ? What if the secretary only would be a party ?

View Post »